Danmark

2. oktober 2015

Video: Netanyahu sender en trykbølge mod FNs “øredøvende tavshed” på iranske trusler at udslette Israel

Filed under: Education, ENGLISH ODER DEUTSCHES VERSION, Israel, skoler, Terror, War — Tags: — Jørn @ 16:30

“Premierminister Benjamin Netanyahu talte til Forenede Nationers Generalforsamling i New York på torsdag, smækker til verdensorganet for dets ligegyldighed over for iranske trusler om at udslette Israel fra landkortet og for at opmuntre den palæstinensiske afvisning…”: http://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/10/video-netanyahu-blasts-uns-deafening-silence-on-iranian-threats-to-wipe-out-israel

12. september 2015

Irans Leder Udfordrer Skæbnen

Filed under: Culture, Demographics, ENGLISH ODER DEUTSCHES VERSION, Israel, USA, War — Tags: — Jørn @ 10:03

Iran’s supreme leader: There will be

no such thing as Israel in 25 years

http://edition.cnn.com/2015/09/10/middleeast/iran-khamenei-israel-will-not-exist-25-years/

Var det hvad Obama aftalte med Iran??

27. juli 2015

Hvad er det Kerry og Co. har aftalt med Iran? Det skal vi have oplyst


Iran-aftalen: Den helt store mystifikationsfestival

af Douglas Murray  •  26. Juli 2015

  • Et generøst menneske ville måske sige, at det ikke betyder noget – når man i Iran råber “død over Amerika,” svarer det til at man klarer halsen.
  • Det er helt sikkert kun et ukærligt menneske, der giver sig til at spekulere over, hvorfor Irans ledere køber den teknologi, som de skal bruge til at afværge et hvilket som helst angreb på deres atomprojekt, samtidig med at de lover amerikanerne, at de ikke udvikler atomvåben.

Deltagere i Teherans masseoptog på Quds-dag afbrænder et amerikansk og et israelsk flag den 10. juli 2015. (Foto: ISNA)

Hvad er det helt præcist, at Obama-regeringen tror har ændret sig vedrørende Irans ledelse? Blandt alle de spørgsmål, som forbliver ubesvarede i kølvandet på P5+1 aftalen med Iran, er dette måske det mest ubesvarede af dem alle.

Der må trods alt være noget, som en vestlig leder ser, når der gøres forsøg på at “normalisere” forholdet til et slyngelregime — noget Richard Nixon så i det kinesiske kommunistparti, som overbeviste ham om, at en optøning af forholdet var mulig, eller noget Margaret Thatcher så i Mikhail Gorbachevs øjne, som overbeviste hende om, at her var omsider en modpart, man kunne stole på.

Fortsæt læsningen af artiklen

En dansk kommentar:

Af Geoffrey Cain

Rebekkavej 5

2900 Hellerup

Det usædvanlige ved Obamas atomaftale med Iran er, at den indebærer et afgørende skift i USAs mellemøstenpolitik. Rollerne er byttet om. Nu er Iran pludselig en slags allieret og ikke længere en potentiel fjende, mens USAs traditionelle venner – Israel og Saudiarabien – er blevet vist vintervejen. Det synes de fleste danske kommentatorer mærkeligt nok ikke at have lagt mærke til, og de har heller ikke undret sig  over den paragraf i aftalen, der lover, at USA vil beskytte Irans atomanlæg mod sabotage og angreb fra…  Ja, fra hvem mon?

Det har den republikanske præsidentkandidat Marco Rubio afkrævet et klart svar på fra udenrigsminister John Kerry (det kan ses på nettet), hvor sidstnævnte vrider sig som en orm på en krog, før han til sidst mumler, at det scenario næppe bliver sandsynligt. Vi må håbe, han har ret, for ellers ser fremtiden sort ud for Israel.

Demokraterne er glade for aftalen, men det er republikanerne ikke, og Ifølge præsidentkandidat Mike Huckabee vil den føre til et nyt holocaust. Men denne udtalelse kalder Berlingskes Kristian Mouritzen “et nyt lavpunkt i debatten”. Hvorfor? Iranske politikere har flere gange sagt, at det er deres agt at brænde Israel op. Men det mener de ikke alvorligt, kan man forstå på Mouritzen?

Gad vide, om han ville mene det samme, hvis han boede i Israel?

25. juli 2015

Britisk Forsoningspolitik med Islam


Britain’s Irreconcilable Policy on Islam

by Douglas Murray  •  July 25, 2015 at 5:00 am

  • The real question is why, when it comes to the most extreme, anti-Western nation-destroyer of them all — a country committed to the annihilation of a UN member state — Her Majesty’s government would not only permit it to have any nuclear project, but would trust the word of a regime with stated genocidal intent when it says that it is not pursuing genocidal weaponry?

Left: Senior Iranian cleric Ayatollah Mohammad Ali Movahedi Kermani, speaking on July 17 in Tehran, behind a banner reading “We Will Trample Upon America” and “We defeat the United States.” Right: Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei, proclaims “Death to America” on March 2.

Two very interesting things happened in Britain over the last two weeks. What makes them more interesting is that they are wholly contradictory.

Abroad, Britain’s foreign secretary, Philip Hammond, put his nation’s name to the P5+1 agreement with Iran, lifting sanctions against the Islamic Republic, unfreezing its assets, lifting arms controls on the regime and much, much more, all in exchange for having potential oversight — with permission requested weeks in advance of any inspection — of the country’s nuclear sites. Britain’s signature on this deal appears to have been an accepted and acceptable outcome with no significant opposition from any senior political figure of either main political party, and very little objection in the national press.

Continue Reading Article

10. januar 2014

As Obama dithers, Egypt ramps up its nuclear options


By Raymond Stock Fox News January 9, 2014
http://www.meforum.org/3716/egypt-nuclear-program

“After the fatally-flawed interim deal signed by the P5+1 in Geneva November 24 over Iran’s nuclear program, America’s slighted ally Egypt is now possibly pursuing its own nuclear option, amid fears of an atomic arms race between Tehran and its regional Sunni rivals in Cairo, Riyadh and beyond…”

6. juni 2013

The Return of the Cold War


“When Iran finishes arming itself, we will witness a dramatic change in the map of the Middle East, with the addition of a dangerous, murderous power that will undermine, subvert or change the orientation of the familiar power group of the United States, Europe, Russia and China.

The Arab television stations, as usual, angrily claim that the West is taking no action to end the slaughter in Syria, and at the same time they represent the Arab leaders as deep in diplomatic negotiations to end the war — while neatly hiding the mistakes, wrong moves and general inability to have the slightest effect on the horrors playing out.

As Muslims massacre each other in the Arab Spring countries, Sunni Islam finds itself in the incongruous position of expecting to be rescued by the Crusader West — the United States and the European countries these Islamists say they wish to Islamize by the sword, and to which they occasionally send terrorists to murder civilians…”

Complements:
Douglas Murray: “Debating” Beheading
Shoshana Bryen: It Wasn’t an Accident

21. februar 2013

The Collapse of Iran’s Rial


From: http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/3597/iran-rial-collpase

“The Iranian banking system is rife with corruption and embezzlement. Of loans to public entities, over 90% are non-performing. The Ayatollahs seem to understand that the real threat to their hold on power comes from Iranians on the street and in the bazaar – people who understand that the government, not sanctions, has ruined the country’s economy…”

11. februar 2013

Iranians on revolution day chant “death to America,” “death to Israel”


iraniansobama

Iranians on revolution day chant “death to America,” “death to Israel”
Feb 10, 2013 01:38 pm | Robert

Such gratitude Nothing new here. They do this every year. But just imagine the outcry if Americans or Israelis were turning out in large numbers to chant “death to Iran.” Today’s fashionable multicultural relativism masks an actual racism that holds Muslims to lower standards than it does everyone else. I…

read more

28. maj 2012

Iran Plans a Nuclear Expansion

Filed under: folkeskolen, Free Speech, Islam, Jihad, skoler, War — Tags: , — Jørn @ 07:29

Iran Plans a Nuclear Expansion

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad attended the opening of Iran’s new parliament Sunday, after United Nations’ inspectors reported the discovery of traces of uranium enriched to higher levels than previously found in Iran. The find sparked fresh concerns that Tehran is moving closer to gaining materials for atomic weapons. Separately, Iran’s nuclear chief, Fereidoun Abbasi, told Iran’s state TV that Iran will build two more nuclear power plants next to a facility that became operational last year.

28. maj 2011

PIPES: Iraq – a province of Iran?

Filed under: ENGLISH ODER DEUTSCHES VERSION — Tags: , — Jørn @ 11:23

Excerpt from: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/may/11/iraq-a-province-of-iran/

“After American forces leave Iraq at the end of 2011, Tehran will try to turn its neighbor into a satrapy, i.e., a satellite state, to the great detriment of Western, moderate Arab and Israeli interests. Intense Iranian efforts are under way already, with Tehran sponsoring militias in Iraq and sending its own forces into Iraqi border areas. Baghdad responds with weakness, its chief of staff proposing a regional pact with Iran and top politicians ordering attacks on the Mujahedeen-e-Khalq (MeK), an Iranian dissident organization with 3,400 members residing in Camp Ashraf, 60 miles northeast of Baghdad. The MeK issue reveals Iraqi subservience to Iran with special clarity. Note some recent developments:

c On April 7, the MeK released intelligence exposing Iran’s growing capacity to enrich uranium, a revelation the Iranian foreign minister quickly confirmed…”

Older Posts »