Danmark

5. juli 2006

The Food Chain Of Internationalism


A new edition is coming soon

The Truth is (That,) What You believe in (?)

– the food chain of internationalism

A book review (below ) 13 chapters, one by another

and 3 appendixes presented in 16 files

by Joern E. Vig

Book Review

by

MSc in Engineering Keld Rasmussen, Roskilde

Winston Churchill is rumoured to have said that he only relied on those statistics he himself had falsified. Take Macro Economics or National Economy – including Monetary and Taxation Policy – In the run-up to global government we’d do well to looking at seriously the implications behind the flippant joke of Churchill:

If you want to be a hammer rather than an anvil you would be wise to trust yourself, use sound common sense and judgement, think for yourself and certainly don’t assume anything as true you don’t have direct knowledge of – especially not when so-called experts wrap up simple issues in complicated concepts.

But is it much worse. Even children, who have not yet internationalised these false concepts will be ensnared as soon as they get to school. Especially in Denmark good people consider national debt, exchange rate changes and taxational political tricks and other governmental economic initiatives to be complicated indecipherable gibberish with a lot of weird inherent consequences. Impossible to survey, to see through and to calculate – it is certainly not a pursuit for ordinary mortals. Official projections and forecasts relating to the economic theory have nearly disappeared from the scene, perhaps for a good reason.

The writer gives you some obvious proposals. Side by side with all kinds of manipulative or illusory ideologies, not least “witchcraft”, economics forms part of the treason against the blinded mass of the populous.

Joern E. Vig gives the reader the courage to think for himself. 7 years in the Danish civil service gave the writer valuable experience behind the scenes. He did not like what he saw. After publishing two books on Business Management he taught for 12 years at the Copenhagen Business School and at the Aarhus School of Business. Now he is a freelance writer and consultant. He is an advisor on EDP, on financial and on statistical issues.

Joern E. Vig has chosen to explain that part of history concerned with the creation of the black-art of economics, and relates this to the fact that too many individuals seem to spend their lives unfulfilled from the beginning of their school days. Can these two subjects be related? They are closely related in a web of intrigue that our rulers do not want you to know about. If you know you might be free.

Keld Rasmussen, Roskilde

E-mail: otier@privat.dk

Table of Contents

Preface

Introduction

Chapter 1

Internationalism is not just moonshine……………………………………….

The biggest lies I was told – Nearly one third of your income tax is used to pay interest in Denmark -The national debt problem and dependence – State-Paper-Debt and Loan-Debt – Impersonal humanity becomes blunted hypo-cracy

Chapter 2

The Inter-War Period……………………………….………………..……………………………

Professor L. V. Birck made a historical, national debt review for Europe in 1925 – New international system of trade, clearing and of national debt – Gold and Gold Standard – A thesis of Arne Rasmussen – Inflation, national debt and dependence (for 7th school class) – Stabilizing foundations of clearing – Bilateral clearing – Bretton Woods negotiations – Henry Morgenthau Jr., John M. Keynes, Harry D. White -The British and the American system-proposals – United money – Norwegian criticism from the exil-address in London.

Chapter 3

Joint Statement by Experts……………………………………………………………………….

A peculiar system for making more national debt – New Economics in thirties – What will the EURO mean.

Chapter 4

The final crash and The New World Order…………………………………………………..

The system development after the war – The late warnings from Robert Triffin – Council On Foreign Relations (C.F.R.) – The American Money System or The Federal Reserve System – FDR’s history in an unofficial version.

Chapter 5

Truth substituted with Lies, Dollars with Federal Reserve Notes,

John Maynard Keynes drank whisky, Karl Marx beer – The treason is old – The Trilateral Commission – Between Two Ages – The Bilderberg Group – ECU and EURO, difficulties with an ideologic construction. – Seldom things are as they are officially reported ( on power leading to Worldwar I)

Chapter 6

Economics of Tide………………………………………………………………

The media-created deflation and monetary created deflation – stagflation – inflation – depression – Nothing new under the sun – Experience with war-financing, state-debt, and a way to bankruptcy – Summery – Capitalization and state-debt enlightened with examples – The Japanese collapses – The economics of tide in USA – Danish relations today – Then and Now.

Chapter 7

The treason seen from Denmark…………………………………………………………..T

he way you get the freedom-fighters to say YES – Mankind (first the farmers and the fishermen) at a turning point – Shock-therapy we shall have, reported Dr. Aurelio Peccei on TV – There is something rotten in that state of Denmark – A professor in Denmark retires – The Enron Scandal properly in dejavue, the collapse of the Danish Agriculture Bank, 1923…not much of the substans in financial swindle has changed.

Chapter 8

What came first, the hen or the egg…………………………………………………….…………..

Why the Russian Revolution – Monopoly and monopsony – Experimental-Psycology – Public expenditure on immmigrants – A load-budget drawn from the Danish Budget

Chapter 9

Mental condition becomes behaviour including criminal behaviour..…………

The development of the criminal acts in Denmark 1960-1990 – Resources to stop criminal acts or stop the criminals – Some explanations to crimes – Crimes and immigrants – Questions to the authorities and their useless, but here by published answers.

Chapter 10

The new man………………………………………………………………………………………..

“The Leipzig Connection” – My own experiences by teaching students to business administrators for 12 years – Wilhelm Maximilian Wundt in Leipzig – G. W. F. Hegel – “The Modern Breaking Through” in Denmark – American psychology was imported from Leipzig in Germany.

Chapter 11

Superior philosophy behind marketing and pedagogy in the 1980s..……….…..

The philosophers including the existentialists behind marketing – Internationalism, the Third and Environment, the Fourth Wave – EU/UN-Pedagogy anno 1996.

Pieces of explanation to the crime-explosion, the Trotsky Plan …….…………..

Chapter 12

Examples of changes in limits and character of the political area…..………….

Compulsion of the trade unions and political compulsion in Denmark – The law of labor unions’ compulsion – Ethnic discrimination by a Danish law against the Danish in Denmark – Citizens Watch – Farmers’ and Fishermen’s watch – Union-propaganda is just a part of the treason – Some conclusive priciples for the rules in a real consti-tution – What is power – Some of the figures – Right-Left-1-2-1-2-Right-Left – Private Top Meeting in Copenhagen

Chapter 13

The ship-wreck of The Plan……………………………………….

The attack on USA September 11th 2001 looked upon with the experience – The Balkan-Wars among other things

Epilog………………………………………………………………………………………

Appendix 1

Globalization and Economy, an concret example of a contribution to 8th International Congress of Professors’ World Peace Academy to be held in Seul, Korea, February 2000

Appendix 2

A new international monetary system – Euro, the end of the social state, extracts of a speech by Prof. W. Hankel

Appendix 3

Enron in Danish deja vue 60 years before

Index ………………………………………………………..

Table of Literature (Bibliography)……………………………

The writer has this websites: www.lilliput-information.com

og http://lilliput-information.blogspot.com/

and this email-address: informationomdanmark@yahoo.com

Preface

Europe at a turning point. Three World Wars started in the 20th century. The last war was being fought in the financial and mental systems until 11th september 2001. The Second World War was also fought financially while physically Second World War took place. So the ongoing war against terror started in the 20th century on the financial and the mental level, but the attack on USA also started the military response to quite a new type of war. Even though “war against terror” is not easy to understand we hear this war certainly is meant to be fought worldwide. Europe with a progress in welfare in the 1950s and 1960s without any side in history, and without any side in the future, is until now not the central battlefield in the war of against terror.

What is the battlefield of this war I cannot tell, but the background leading to the war will perhaps show that there is no battlefield at all or let’s say the whole world is the battlefield. I shall not take the agenda from the mainstream-media.

This would be too easy and rather uninteresting, and like every war it has a background that certainly is not told on screen.

I have chosen to explain the part of the history that concerns the creation of but from the beginning an antiquated system of economy-considerations, and the human disaster that can be seen in the fact that too many European individuals seem to end in misery from the beginning of their school days.

What are wars about? Do people suddenly hate each other, and do the states running the nations or do the people in the nations then have to begin a war? The concept “power” has some meaning to most people. But have you thought out what power really is? I have tried to pin down what power really is.Is power military strenght? What about contempt for death? Is money power? How much for my thoughts? We will get closer in this book. Until you have read it, you may think what you want. Choosefor yourself. I hope we agree in the end. My proposal to the few remaining ideologists:Once and for all, you can think of integrating the power or of disintegrating the power, but unfortunately (it is apparently my luck) you cannot finance your possible ideological thoughts to reality. And even if you could, it would not help you…your thoughts have not a tiny bit of similiarity to how the human being really is, how people are or permanently can be brought up to be, believe it or not.

“The Isms” are therefore always financed by the power brokers, because they know you will fail…every time, and the powe brokers end up then being the winners every time. If you continue this book, you will receive the chance to learn what power, what power really is. You will not be laughing all the way through, but perhaps you will find out what freedom to use your power really is.

I shall concentrate intirely on facts.A profound tested German experimental-psychological project from the 19th century conquered USA before the last war (Pavlov). It has spread to Europe. A plan had been made for Europe, and one for the world too, long before you were born. The New World Order or ‘The Planet of the Apes’ you can call it as you like. I shall try to show what brought us into a central directed, planned economics, half-Fascist, chaotic, subsi-dized Europe without civil rights, and lots of holy so-called human rights, but with a ‘media-cracy’ in a short passing phase at best. I don’t believe in any kind of a world conspiracy, I don’t believe in anything of this world. A lot of participants in the Great Work of Ages have told us fragments about their doings: The new world order, what some of the founders said about it: http://www.lilliput-information.com/economics/nwo.html. But fragments were not enough for me. I wanted to know more. The fraudulent international monetary system created in the Second World War was suitable if not design-ed for the weak postwar (professional) politicians, who followed the line of least resistance.

The European Monetary Union (EMU) were supposed to draw back the power to Europe (puppets tell us), from where it moved to USA in the twenties, the thirties and especially in the forties. And NAFTA in the Americas is like EU in the 1960s and the 1970s, expected to bring more free trade (the puppets tell them). What the prices paid by ordinary people are planned to be, I shall try to tell in an unostentatious and idiomatic language without the usual witchcraft that has become so common if not compulsory among economists educated after the Second World War.

To the last mentioned, I have chosen a series of concrete short reviews seen from Denmark, but the reader will see and understand corresponding reviews in his own nation in what I tell. I have chosen the most convergent and the most determining phenomena, not the ones that were officially meant to be chosen. The preconditions for your understanding are: You have to open your eyes, you have to consider the matter free of empty phrases. The Danes were the first to say NO (to the Maastricht Treaty) with the voting-paper 2nd June 1992, the same year we beat Europe in football. May 18th 1993 they won the game using sweet words and blows with a stick using 1 billion DKr. mediacosts. Later followed the Amsterdam Treaty which the Danes accept too even though they formally got four reservation to the Maastricht Treaty to get it through. Now a monster has been created because ‘Amsterdam’ depended on “Maastricht”. And to make it further complicated, the Danes voted no to Euro September 28th 1998. We are still waiting for a fourth, a fifth …and perhaps a seventh referendum, because we are not left with the impression that the visible power-puppets have yet reached the results they told us they wanted… for us.

They have their problems, certainly they have. And perhaps the power-puppets are not able to explain the results convincing to those stupid Danes? Or perhaps the Danes outside the circles of the power-puppets hate lies? The work with this little book started in 1990. Thanks to Department Head at the University of Aalborg, Denmark P. H. Bering, thanks to Author Jens Jackie Jensen, Herlev, and thanks to Director Torvald Fonsboel, Vejle for their wise and encouraging comments and proposals to this book.

“He who knows the truth,

and does not let it appear and expose –

he is a pitiful coward, indeed”

(Willi Senff)

Joern E. Vig

Introduction

Denmark as we know it is coming to an end. The country (understood mainly as a homogenous national state) within the next two generations at least from today will be unrecognizable to a grown up Dane of today, if he is shown a map of Denmark, as we know it, and is told that this map actually shows the peace of ground which he is standing on. I do not maintain that the geography will change essentially.Today every alert Dane can see that this is very likely to happen, if the ruling tendencies are allowed to continue. If you follow those official descriptions of the country and the community that still exist – many of them in quite a decreasing quality -, you will not doubt where the country is going to with mathematical certainty. The Germans may observe precisely the same reality and the same perspective.How could it end so wrong: Why shall Denmark, Germany – and perhaps USA as well – come to an end?

Why is after all a strange, claiming word.The logical consequence, that leads Denmark without moderate disturbing intervention to an end is only one part of the answer to this why.What motives and what purposes you shall see Denmark or USA develop to in that decay is the other half of that why.When I eventually had got enough time, after having taught on the commercial college for 12 years and worked in the government department for 7½ years, I decided to investigate that decisive question for me: Why shall Denmark come to an end?’Something is very wrong in Denmark, the mill of Dybboel is milling just to hell’, John Mogensen sang in 1972. Louis Miehe-Renard sang: ‘Do not believe them’ the same year. It is fundamentally a good idea at the starting point to investigate, who benefits from a crime when you shall look for its cause.

Perhaps I am too self-opinionated, too stiff. Perhaps. The reader may judge. I show a development, some courses.What have you fallen over yourself in your own development? Things that have remained mysteries. Fear, sense of guilt, inferiority, perhaps lack of self-respect or just ignorance. All of us know these things. They enclose us very much. I looked for the missing tracks too.

Decisive for your benefit of this reading:

All of us have a framework, from where we are thinking, and our frameworks are of course different. You have to be willing to expose your framework to an experiment of disruption, if you want to go on in getting an answer to your unanswered or your falsely answered questions. The frame-works or the shell around your and my universe limits our outlooks and knowledge. It has to be so for some time. The longer you have thought in a given framework the more difficult perhaps it is for you to break the shell. All of your identity is gradually tied up to just your usual world of imagination within your known referring frame. Time is perhaps the most difficult to connect with your understanding. Your imagination of time is nearly always connected solidly to your own limited term of years.If you are untrained, as most academics are, then you have to cross limits in yourself in order to see what a treason, you perhaps are placed in. If you altogether can see then, there is a treason. Perhaps you will be shocked while you read my book, and perhaps you will refuse to see. But in that case you must remember this beginning:

A very simple treason, but it has been made complicated in your customary/taught framework, and it has been made very simple compared to what is rather more complex in relation to your usual imaginations.

Without your acceptance of this assumption you may stop the reading here.I will start with the lies, the fatal lies I have been told. In that way I hope to find the tracks to the grave of Denmark, Germany and USA or of another country at last. Just after Worldwar I Denmark was pretty close to go bankrupt among other things cause by an “Enron Scandale” in historical dejavue (1923).Johannes Joergensen begins his “Bell Roland” in this way in 1916:

“Bell Roland is my name

“when I peal, it is fire

“when I ring, it is victory in Flanderland!”

This was written at the big bell in Gents Beffroi in days of old. Bell Roland rings, Bell Roland rings, Flandern’s big bell of fight and of victory rings out into Ragnarok. And if we Nordic listen very well, then we clearly hear that it is our mother’s voice, it talks, and that it says and sings like the scald in the Nordic Hymn:

Beast die,

Kinsman die,

One I know that never dies,

the Judge against the dead.

(unquote)

Chapter 1

Internationalism is not just moonshine

Where does the experience, the influence of today come from?I will also show how we were prepared for the lies through a special psychology called mind control.Somebody may learn to distinguish between development and dismantling. Sometimes it can be difficult.

The first lie: Nation debt is of no importance. The second lie: multiculture

When I started to study economics at the university of Aarhus, Denmark in 1969 state-debt was of no importance. You should not even mention the word, because it was meant to mean nothing. It was simply ridiculous to mention the debt of the state. We were two students who did not believe this to be true. He reached the top of the Danish financial branch. He must have learnt to shut up.

Talking has always been my problem.The debt-lie was one of many lies that revolved in my mind in the first years at university.When I look back today, I know I am right. I have learned a lot including a considerably amount of lies. I would like to ask: Could the disintegration of Denmark had happened in the fifties? Absolutely not. Had anyone dared to suggest the disintegration to happen in the fifties?

Absolutely not. If anyone had dared to suggest this with bad hidden excuses to for example impersonalized humanity[3] in the fifties, the proposer would for sure have been locked up with a diagnosis, especially if his speech had constantly got well through to the public. Today the reaction is close to the opposite. What has happened is against reason and custom of state, and without any discussion in the deepest inconsistency with the spirit and the letters of the Constitution? But something else had to develop in advance. An immigrations of about 20 millions muslims to Europe in a priod of about 20 years. Nearly the same number as in USA.

Many of the supremes in Denmark and in Europe have not only reported the economy-lies and their consequences. They have arranged the community and the communities according to these lies. But the supremes, they could not be so stupid. No, the real rulers are not stupid, I do absolutely not think of the members of the Danish parliament, Folketinget. It is cold on top, they say. Most of us believed them.

The objectives were just not the announced ones. So simple is this.Suddenly in the beginning of the 1990s the Minister of Finances could see rises in the prices on the shares in stock market, a so-called boom that did really existed, because production and jobs did not boom, and a lot of the boom on the market of shares had even been paid by borrowing against security of government bonds (helt by the public, and especially by the institutional investors). At such occurrences our (then) Conservative Minister of Finance used to talk about recovery of the the strong Danish economy, and even incredible strong Danish economy. In 1993 we then got a social democratic Minister of Finances with new expectation. There was not much difference in what they did.

The easy-money floated perhaps a little more as tax-financed subsidies to lines of businesses with high unemployment. Few people believed him either. He and his predecessors have sung this song a lot of times for the last 30 years. More paper money, more debt,… more wealth? So older people never believe them. They feel they have no real choice. I don’t feel old.

In 1994 BBC-TV reported that international trade between the EU-countries and The United Kingdom had fallen by 15% in the period 1986-1994 – in 1986 they decided the Interior Market in EEC meant to develope the free trade further, they told us. It is funny that it never develop as (officially) planned. Lower taxes, lower value-added-taxes, more harmony in tax-laws etc. Nothing was still developing as they told us.

Now they tried to introduce a new compulsory European currency among 14 indebted members of EU. International monopolies (markets with one supplier) or competitors in oligopolies (markets with a few suppliers) have little interest in lower personal taxes, lower national value-added-taxes in an Europe nearly with citizens watch instead of physical boarders. So they fight for at new currency that will bring power back to Europe making it much easier for businesses and tourists, they told us. A few still remembered that currency and national sovereignty is the two side of the coin. But this mean nothing. Nations were just an idea from the 1800s, General Wesley Clark told us in 1999. All the problems can not be found in the money and economy, alone. No, but the money and the economy were some of the means. Money is power they say and power perform the world – they say, but you will know better. Perhaps is money the strongest of all the means. Or is there something much more powerful. Some say:There is a lack of ethics actually, perhaps of Christianity and of its values, somebody would maintain. We have forgotten what is right and wrong. To ensure that we will (not) return to our roots, the foundation was removed from our everyday efforts, and with this our destiny was put into the hands of others. I don’t know.

State debt means dependence:

Today the distinction between foreign debt and domestic debt is of no real interest for the understanding. But the distinction between loan-debt (LD) and government bonds (GB) and other government debt-paper have quite another meaning today. GB is being sold in enormous amounts all over the world in order to get foreign exchange. The geography and the nationality have no real sense, when you ignore the domestic-taxation. Especially the domestic debt has been issued by the parrots of John Maynard Keynes[4] to create a voluminous public sector. Lots of governments bonds, an steady increasing amount of money and cheap credit combined with rising taxes advance this objective. A still growing enormous public sector, more subsidy to the tax-raised wages, an enormous state-debt and a so-called increased stability by (false) high employment by directing the demand via subsidys to where the public want it to be. About 35-40% of the Danish bricklayers, carpenters and painters were unemployed in 1993.

At that they have tried ‘to repeal the Law of Heaviness’ in their new mysterious Religion For Peoples Of Earth. The distinction between GB and LD has a little relevance for another reason. GB has a price, and therefore it is as things are developing a minor secure claim to put money into than a LD claim, which is agreed in some exchange and on other more or less fixed terms, some of those usually can be influenced by the lender too. The state is determing the term in GB claims, but not the courses. The Keynesians handle GB as a mean “to absorb domestic purchasing power,” when the government for example prefer public spent money.

That interpretation has really no meaning at all. It is simply a suited misunderstanding of the concept purchasing power or a mixing up of production and consumption. Chapter 6 deals with this. On the 31st January 1995 the Danish state and the Danish municipalities owed about 830 Mia. DKr. (six months later about 852 mia. DKr.) or more than the salable production in Denmark in one year, and 160,000 DKr. (or £17,000) a Dane. In 2000 the debt is still close to 1 (European) billion or one American (trillion) d.kr. In Sweden – governed by the IMF (International Monetary Fond) in a period of the 1990s – the debt was more than 180,000 skr. a Swede. Sweden got a speculation-clip after having presented a public deficit of about 100 Mia. SKr. on the balance of payments in 1991, and after the Danes thought they had voted NO to the European Union June 2nd 1992. The rulers would not like such a voting result in Sweden too. The clip was only a reminder of what could happen, and perhaps be much worse.

As far as I can judge Sweden went bankruptcy – they call it a lot of other things today – in 1992 and had to accept a devaluation of its currency of 30%. Three month before this the Danish Minister of Economics Niels Helveg Petersen wrote in Aarhus Stiftstidende (a local Danish newspaper) that Denmark should certainly choose the same economics policy as the one in Sweden.The national debt of Germany had reached about 2,5 billion DM in 1995. It was built up in a few years, and about 500 Mia. DM was caused by the reunion of Germany until 1995. Every German owed (1995) about 31,000 DM (or £10,000 or Dkr. 120,000).

It has to be underlined that the debt dealt with here is the one the citizens have not contracted in any other way than that they have voted for the politicians. This politicians have borrowed a lot of money in order to redeem there own political promises as clever or as quickly as possible, and especially to stay in power. They have done it in a way that does not give us the possibility to place the responsibility for their actions, when nearly all of them on the whole were acting in that way in changing governments. The change of the government and of the Minister of Finance in 1993 changed the words.

The unemployment-camouflage was the subsidy-economy in a large scale.Not even Germany could honor the EMU-demands (for entering the Euro. These demands will be listed below) in the third phase (1997) any longer, only Luxembourg that is living by the EU-bureau-cracy and by discreet banking like Switzerland honored the demands. That must be tragicomic even to a unionist, if he knew.

This is the truth regardless what you were told by several European, for example the Danish TV-employees Hans Bischoff and Poul Joergensen and others of this ilk. These gentlemen are tools for the top, or they do not even know anything themselves. Both the mentioned have an interrupted education of economy behind them. How could it go on for so long? Because you were told a lot of lies, half truths, twisted truths, and several deciding truths were never told at all. Has it happened before? Yes, several times before, but it was not expected to be of any interest to you. You should not think of it as problems. You were meant to do your job, spend your money, look at TV, read your paper, eventually your text-books, and don’t ask too many challenging (called stupid) questions.From where did these false arrangements of money and of understanding monetary issues originate, I asked myself?

Go to next chapter


[1]Professional politician I define as politician for the personal avancement.

[2] Anyone who has read af crime novel knows that a detective starts asking three questions: Who has a motive, eventually an economic profit or any other benefit from it? Who has the means to go through with it? And who has had the possibility to do it?

[3] When this impersonalized humanity is financed by the state or by other taxfinanced autoritives e.g. international or supernational, and it is whipped up well in the electronic, state- and ideology-ruled media and the press as is the fact in Denmark to Exhibitionistic Humanity, the result is blunted hypocricy.

[4] His matematical models are fine. The problem is that they are introduce to explain relations among people on this earth.

[5] As we shall see, they advert that they can kick the economy to recover with more public expenditures. They can not. The public expenditures drains the economy.

[6] For the latest years the Danish account of state-debt has not been entirely reliable. In the media you most hear about the citizens’ private debt. According to DR-Text-TV-News Februar 6th the debt of the Danes increased by dkr. 92 billions or dkr. 76 each a day in 2001.

[7] Milliard in Europe is called billion in U.S.A.

[8] Billion in Europe is called trillion in U.S.A.

Sonia

Danmark: Green Card Ordning i USA burde give erfaringer


Green-Card-ordning i USA og en af dens følger:

Den 10. Maj 1990, skænkedes Sheik Omar et ét-års visum af en CIA agent til at møde frem som værende officiel ved U.S.-konsulatet i Khartum, Sudan, og siden ankom han til New York i juli 1990. I november det samme år blev Sheik Omars visum inddraget, og udenrigsministeriet anmodede immigrations- og naturalisations-myndighederne om at være på udkik efter ham.

Så omhyggelig var INS’s rådgivning, at de straks tildelte Sheik Omar et såkaldt Green Card bare 5 måneder senere.

Iman Ahmad Abulaban har haft “den blinde sheik” Omar Abdel Rahman til at tale i sin moske og modtog denne med åbne arme og stor ærbødighed. Omar Abdel Rahman, som nu er dømt til livsvarigt fængsel i USA for mord og sprængning af “World trade Center”, er kendt for sine klare udtalelser: “Slå til og dræb Guds fjender overalt for at få fjernet efterkommere af aber og svin fodret ved zionismens, kommunismens og imperialismens bord” (citat E. Ettrup. “Islamiske ekstremister”. Kbh. 1996). Abdel Rahman blev også modtaget med åbne arme i flere århusianske moskeer.

Den 26. Februar 1993 blev World Trade Center ligeledes angrebet af terrorister med bombe, der dræbte seks mennesker og sårede mere end tusind andre. Amerikanernes følelse af immunitet over for international terror var da fordrevet, skulle man mene.

Men havde det effekt i de højere kredse, der skal tage vare på borgernes frihed og sikkerhed, som de lovede da og ditto i tiden fremover?

Lederne af det radikale islamiske netværk, der bl.a. var ansvarlige for den første bombning, og som senere planlagde en kampagne for byterrorisme, der kunne have krævet og måske vil kræve tusinder af amerikaneres liv, fik på et tidspunkt finansiel støtte og træning af CIA, meldte New American den 3. Marts 1997. Tilmed i flere kritiske forbindelser, hvor afsløringer lå lige for, og terrorlederne kunne have været arresteret, ignorerede Federal Law Enforcement terrornetværket eller ydede det støtte, hævder nævnte kilde.

Den centrale terroristskikkelse i dette netværk var Sheik Omar Abdel-Rahman, den ”åndelige leder” af den ægyptiske extremistgruppe Gama al-Islamiya. I januar 1996, blev Sheik Omar kendt skyldig i ”oprørsk konspiration” i US A og idømt fra 25 år til livstidsstraf. Hans forsvarere hævdede deres klient var blevet gjort til et offer for en anti-muslimsk rettergang. Sheik Omar og hans tilhængere blev faktisk arresteret i juni 1993 og på tidspunktet for arrestationen var nogle af konspiratorerne faktisk i færd med at blande kemikalier til bombefremstilling.

Ved domfældelsen meddelte den assisterende offentlige anklager Andrew C. McCarthy: ”Der findes et støttesystem for terrorisme i USA, hvis designer er Sheik Abdel-Rahman…[det ville være] naivt at tro, at det er blevet ødelagt.”

Dette ifølge Two Seconds Under the World, en redegørelse om (første) World Trade Center-bombning bragt i New York Newsday af Pulitzerpris-vinderne Jim Dwyer, David Kocieniewski, Deidre Murphy og Peg Tyre, der ligeledes dokumenterer, at Sheik Omars disciple har etableret terroristceller i Texas, Californien, Illinois og Michigan….”

I samarbejde med en karismatisk sudaneser ved navn Siddig Ali, en disciple af Sheik Omar,rekrutterede Salem syv lokale muslimer til at tage terror-mål i øjensyn, planlægge taktikker og skaffe kemikalier og elektriske dele til bomber….”

CIA– forbindelse

Sheik Omar blev dømt for meddelagtig i komplottet, der myrdede den tidligere ægyptiske præsident Anwar Sadat. Han havde viet sit voksenliv til at styrte det ikke-religiøse ægyptiske styre og propagandere for sin varietet af Islam. I 1987 satte det amerikanske udenrigsministerium Sheik Omars navn på dets ”overvågningsliste” med ikke-amerikanere, der er involveret i terrorisme. Dette forhindrede ikke, at han samtidig blev placeret på listen over såkaldte ”værdifulde formuegoder” i dækkede operationer omfattende den afghanske mujahideen i 1980-erne.

[Sheik Omar afsoner i dag en livstidsdom i USA.]

So ein Ding müssen wir auch haben:

– også selvom arbejdskraftmangelen ikke er reel – så er der andre kvalifikationer ved visse nøglepersoner, og det skal belønnes med nedsat skat:

https://danmark.wordpress.com/2006/06/23/jobannoncer-uden-reelle-jobs/

https://danmark.wordpress.com/2006/06/23/velfaerd-og-konkurrence-uden-ideologi-i-praksis/

”…Allerede før valget i 2001 var der i Danmark indført en såkaldt jobkort-ordning (Green-Card i USA), der indebærer en maksimal skatteprocent på 25 pct. af indtjeningen de første tre år for udenlandske, højtuddannede nøglemedarbejdere. Med denne beskatning opnår de pågældende samme rettigheder og samme adgange til den offentligt finansierede danske velfærd som danskerne, der ganske vist skal betale den fulde pris. Tilmed en så høj pris at vore salgbare produkter ikke kan produceres og afsættes i tilstrækkelig mængde til, at velfærden kan finansieres i fremtiden. De ledende ved altså godt, det er hel galt fat. Dokumentationen: http://www.workindenmark.dk/Taxation/0/1/0…”

 

Sonia

Glemmer du?


Glemmer du, så husker vi alt

– skal ud til en bredere kreds, fordi folk skal kende antallet her i landet.

Dette antal holdes bevidst skjult kun for at holde dig i ro.

JP: 30. maj 2004 “I Københavns kommune er nu hele 45 pct. af alle 1. klasseelever indvandrerbørn, flertallet fra muslimske lande. Denne dramatiske udvikling i de unges befolkningssammensætning vil komme til at betyde en forandring og omvæltning af hele det danske samfund.”

Historiens mest simple befolkningsprognose: Når disse 1. klasseelever forlader 10. klasse i 2014, kan vi vel sige, at 45 pct. af de 17-årige er indvandrerunge. 10 år senere kan vi vel sige, at 45 pct. af 27-årige er indvandrervoksne. Derefter skal der kun 10 år mere til….., og så har vi endda her forudsat, at der ikke kommer flere til fra Langtbortistand.

JP: 30. maj 2004 “Den officielle danske befolkningsfremskrivning viste dengang, at 10,9% af befolkningen i 2050 ville være indvandrere eller efterkommere fra et ikke-vestligt land.””Rambøll Management havde for avisen spurgt et repræsentativt udsnit af danskerne om, hvorvidt de troede, at muslimer i fremtiden vil udgøre et flertal af Danmarks befolkning. Næsten hver fjerde dansker – 24 pct. – svarede ja. Og blandt disse mente knap 60 pct., at det ville ske inden for 30 år.” (slut på citater) Politikerne var også meget forundrede. Det viste forskellige småsuk i bladene. Information om Danmark valgte at lade debatten køre i 2004.

JP: 30. maj 2004 ”Et barn af en efterkommer vil komme til at figurere som dansker i statistikken, hvis blot en af forældrene er dansk statsborger og født i Danmark. I praksis vil det betyde, at 3. generation typisk kommer til at figurere i statistikken som danskere. Men derfor vil personen i 3. generation stadig – i alle tilfælde som udgangspunkt – have en muslimsk baggrund, hvis forældrene havde det. Og dermed vil antallet af personer i Danmark med muslimsk baggrund være større end de 10,9 pct., som er indeholdt i definitionerne ‘indvandrere’ og ‘efterkommere’ fra Danmarks Statistik…

Men der findes en anden prognose – om end fagfolkene bag den ikke ynder at få den frem i offentligheden. Prognosen er bestilt af Integrationsministeriets tænketank for bedre integration hos det uafhængige analyseinstitut DREAM under Finansministeriet.”Om de 10,9% repræsenterer muslimer, der ikke må tælles, eller de repræsenterer ikke-vestlige immigranter, skal man spørge Jyllandsposten.

JP: 30. maj 2004 ”Lederen af DREAM, da prognosen blev lavet, Lars Haagen Pedersen, i dag sekretariatschef i Velfærdskommissionen… advarer mod at bruge tallene i en diskussion om, hvor stor en andel af befolkningen i Danmark, der i år 2050 vil have en muslimsk baggrund: ‘Ingen ved jo, om personer i 3. eller 4. eller 5. generation vil have en muslimsk baggrund i den forstand, det forstås netop i dag. Det ender i det rene gætteri. Det har ikke noget med statistik at gøre.” (slut på citater)

I et læserbrev i Jyllands-Posten bemærkedes problemet med den officielle definition af ‘efterkommer’ – der statistisk set fjernede muslimer fra statistikken hvis blot en af forældrene havde statsborgerskab. Basalt set en oplysning, der gjorde artiklens overordnede pointe til noget nær en lodret løgn – ikke mindst i det korte abstrakt, som gik igen i de fleste danske medier.

Information om Danmark:

27. maj 2005 “Indvandrere” og “efterkommere” blev fastlagt under skarpe protester fra egentlig sagkyndige uden for centraladministrationens rækker. Vi advarede i 1991 og flere gange senere mod de uvidenskabelige begreber, der ville tillade en let forudselig bevidst forvirring, man nu fra centralt hold skabte med overlagt forsæt at ødelægge landet med indvandring.

At Lars Haagen Pedersen står for en uofficiel prognose, der kun må bruges i Integrationsministeriet (og efter hvad vi får oplyst også i Rockwoolfondens afdelinger), som det stod at læse i Jyllandsposten, burde få normalttænkende danskere til at skrige lazaronerne ud på Jyllandsposten og i centraladministrationen. Bemærk, i øvrigt at det JP-hyrede konsulentfirma fik muslimerne blandet ind i avisdebatten som tællebegreb, netop for fikst at kunne afspore debatten, når de uærlige må give op. Netop fordi der ikke tælles muslimer noget sted i Vesten. En sådan diskussion kunne jo fortsætte uden nogensinde at nå til svaret på det egentlige spørgsmål, der var udgangspunktet.

PS: Der er allerede mindst 13 pct. fremmede ( d.v.s. 700.000, hvoraf vi ved mere end 70 pct. stammer fra et muslimsk domineret område) i Danmark pr. 1. januar 2006 – givet flere for korrektionerne er stadig mangelfulde:

Prognose på et delvis korrigeret grundlag:

https://danmark.wordpress.com/2006/06/20/prognose-pa-korrigeret-befolkningsgrundlag/

Løgnens omfang:

https://danmark.wordpress.com/2006/06/21/hvad-der-gemmes-i-sne/

Anbefal denne fil

Joern E. Vig

Information om Danmark

“if your heart is filled use your brain”

Siden Schengen – det ufattelige er let fatteligt


– for den der ser, hører, husker

Den 27. februar 2001 kunne det danske Justitsministerium efter længere tids gransken meddele en tålmodigt ventende offentlighed, at Nice-trakten, som Poul Nyrup Rasmussen underskrev i 2000 , ikke fører til, at Danmark afgiver suverænitet i et omfang, der kræver at traktaten ratificeres af Folketinget med 5/6-flertal uden folkeafstemning.

Prøv: http://ww.lilliput-information.com/euint.html

Ikke overraskende. Man ved vel hvem man har placeret på posten.

Shengen-Aftalen:

Blev oprindelig vedtaget af Folketinget lige op til tingets sommerferie – som så meget andet af uhyre vigtighed for landets ødelæggelse. Den 25. marts 2001 træder Schengen-traktaten i kraft. Det betyder, skrev de på dansk teksttv, ”at dansk politi nu kan forfølge en forbryder langt ned i Tyskland uden problemer”. Det var da godt.

Schengen, der fysisk åbner grænserne i Europa, medfører umiddelbart den af toppen ønskede elektroniske kontrol med individernes gøren og laden i Europa, og samtidig må vi konstatere, at den fysiske kontrol, også ved EU’s ydergrænser totalt smuldrer netop samtidig hermed.

Elektronisk personkontrol:

Sådan skrev The Guardian i England samme år: Et udkast af det første regeringsfremstillede personlige ID smartcard har været været fremvist i kabinettet. Kortet kan erstatte kørekort, pas, pensionsbog og medicinkort. Der vil blive brugt biometri og password til kortet.

IoD: De åbne grænser i EU forstås bedre i dette lys. Hitler og Stalin ville have elsket denne ID chip, 666. Sidstnævnte herrers registratur og genfinding var alt for tidskrævende og usikker. EU derimod nu med et 18-cifret personnummer på et spionkort til alle borgere i EU, der skal sættes i gang snart. Et spionkort til dit liv. Læs mere herom på for den kommer nu: http://www.lilliput-information.com/id.html

Ad EU’s ydergrænse i 2001

Spanien invaderes: El Ejido, Spanien, er en landbrugsby, der ligger i skyggen af Sierra Gador bjergene. Engang kendt for sine tomater og peperfrugter.

I februar hærgede en 3-dages borgerkrig i området. Årsag: Sidste år fangedes over 50.000 illegale indvandrere på Gibraltars kyst. Ildpåsættelser og overfald. I årevis har vi europæere set med foragt og distance på USA’s 2000 miles lange sydvestgrænse. Middelhavskysten har 85.000 km grænse. Med et opløst Sovjet, et grænseløst Europa og et tiår med krigtilstand på Balkan er der sat et menneskehav i bevægelse. Det startede dog allerede, da danske politikere tillod det systematisk fra 1983. Nu ville Spaniens regering (2001) have en ny immigrationslov, der skal fjerne uddannelse, indhusning og andre velfærdsydelser til fremmede, som ikke kan dokumentere, de har godkendt immigrantstatus. Man vil fjerne hvad Madrid rigtigt opfatter som incitamenterne for afrikanere til at tage den farlige tur over strædet ved Gibraltar, den europæiske Rio Grande.

Immigrations-eksperterne i Godhedsindustrien siger, at afrikanerne blot kommer for at udføre de jobs, som Spanierne ikke vil have. De siger også at Europas befolkning vil gå tilbage fra år 2025, hvis vi ikke modtager millioner af fremmede. Vi kender sangen. Det betyder intet. Europas befolkning har været meget mindre end i dag, endog i perioder, hvor glæden ved livet selvsagt som forudsætning for vækst var større og ledigheden langt mindre.Mindre end 17 km fra den spanske havn Tarifa begynder Afrika. Geografisk er der næsten ingen afstand; men afstanden kan næsten ikke blive større, når den f.eks. måles i økonomiske termer. I Spanien er indkomsten per indbygger $14.500 pr. år, i Marokko er den $1.100. Det tog Muhammed et år at tjene de $1000 til billetten over strædet, hvis ikke han lånte pengene hos en menneskesmugler.

På den anden side kan han tjene $20 om dagen ved at plukke tomater, peperfrugter og meloner. I de sidste 4 år er mere end 170.000 illegale immigranter landet i Spanien, ca. 70% er taget over Gibraltar-Strædet til Spanien fra Marokko. Resten kommer fra Latinamerika, Centralafrika, Østeuropa og Kina.

Når Spanien eventuelt strammer lovgivningen, er det ikke vanskeligt at regne ud, hvilken retning immigrantstrømmen så tager. I Italien, Frankrig og Grækenland findes de samme fænomener.

Spanien 5 år efter år 2006:

https://danmark.wordpress.com/2006/06/09/europa-500000-600000-indvandrere-pr-aar-fremover/

Globaliseringen:

Befolkningsudviklingen syd for Middelhavet og i Sydasien er af følgende udseende:

Årene 1998 og 2050 (hele millioner) iflg. FN World Population Prospects, 1998 revision:

Iran: 64 mio./115 mio.

Tyrkiet: 65 mio./101 mio.

Egypten: 66 mio./115 mio.

Bangladesh: 123 mio./212 mio.

Pakistan: 142 mio./345 mio.

(blot et udpluk)

Med en samtidig forventning om et reduceret befolkningstal i Europa er det ikke svært at få øje på det tomrum, der tilsyneladende opstår.De to højest rangerende, men selvskabte problemer i Europa er Godhedsindustriens behov for aktivitet og erhvervslivets ønske om billig arbejdskraft.

Med modstående monopol på arbejdsmarkedet har virksomhederne fundet fint sammen med (ikke de ansatte) fagforenings-milliardærerne [bare Lønmodtagernes Dyrtidsfond indeholder i dag (2001) 550 mia. kr.] og sammen med de skattefinansierede offentlige funktionærer har sat lønninger og skatter/afgifter så højt, at ingen aktivitet byggende på europæisk arbejdskraft efterhånden må kunne betale sig.

Det er planlagt sådan:

Der er bare det problem i lang tid fremover, at de nødvendige kvalifikationer vanskeligt hentes i landdistrikterne i Tyrkiet, Pakistan eller Marokko.Muligvis vil det lykkes for komplottet at få importeret den del af mellemklassens børn og unge fra ulandene, der har fået en uddannelse i Vesten. Meget taler dog for, at det bedre betaler sig for industrien at flytte aktiviteterne til disse unges hjemlande, hvilket sker samtidig. Desuden har USA og England trukket dem til sig siden begyndelsen af 1980-erne.
Måske vil organisationen, Dansk Industri også måtte sande dette.

Danmarks deroute:

Vi skulle netop i den ånd have satset meget mere på de højtekniske brancher og vidensproduktion. Adskillige med fingeren på pulsen har advaret gang på gang. Så undskyldninger er falskhed og skal belønnes derefter. Chancherne er blevet forspildte – og nærmest på beregning.Sagen er jo den, at funktionærer i Godhedsindustrien og de kontigent-hungrende fagforeninger i langt højere grad sætter dagsordenen i Danmark end industrien og erhvervslivet, hvor de sidstnævnte i øvrigt også for længst har købt sig ind ad bagdøren for tvivlsomme midler.

Det smutte en gang imellem (men det går bare man sikrer sig at det ikke omtales for meget!):

https://danmark.wordpress.com/2006/06/23/jobannoncer-uden-reelle-jobs/

To gange bedyrede Nyrup Rasmussen skriftligt og mundtligt i officielle redegørelser, at Danmark skal satse på relevant uddannelse og forskning og dermed på vidensproduktion helt centralt. Der er intet sket.

Men så sker nok under den borgerlige regering fra 2001 (se neden for).

Her skal man være der, når toget kører, og det er et helt andet tog, end ”det der efter sigende skulle køre fra Bruxelles”. Absolut intet er sket, og mulighederne forspildes bare i selvforstærkende, accelererende hast. På Finansloven for 2001 er der skåret med 4% i netop disse budgetter i forhold til blot 1998, samtidig er de offentlige udgifter samlet ikke desto mindre planlagt at skulle stige med reelt 2%.

Om en anden statsminister ville gøre det bedre, såfremt det ikke allerede var for sent, kan man i høj grad betvivle (se neden for). Interesserne i de forskellige lejre er de samme og tradition for handling har der aldrig været blandt de ledende uden de selv samme havde en kortsigtet fordel heraf.

Schengen udvikler sig

Ingen tvivl, liberalismen vil også have del i den internationale immigrant-høst efter internationalen i de sidste 25 er blevet forsynet med klienter at øve deres kunster på. Tænketanks-medlem, cand. polit. og foredragsholder Hans Kornø Rasmussen er tilsyneladende altid på linie med EU-Kommissionen. Fra 2007 skal immigrationen til EU gradvis forøges med fra en faktor 8 voksende til en faktor 14 i 2024. http://www.lilliput-information.com/kornoe.html

Allerede før valget i 2001 blev et såkaldt green-card-arrangement introduceret. Det betyder i Danmark en maksimal indkomstskatte-rate på 25 pct. af indtjeningen i de første tre år for højtuddannede udlændinge som nøglemedarbejdere. Med denne beskatning får de berørte de samme rettigheder og adgange til den offentligt finansierede velfærd som danskerne, der selvfølgelig skal betale den fulde pris. Endog en så høj pris at vore salgbare produkter ikke kan blive produceret og solgt i tilstrækkelige mængder til at finansiere velfærden i fremtiden. Så det er er tydeligt at ledende så sandelig har forstået, hvad der er galt.

Dokumentation for Green Card-ordningen: http://www.workindenmark.dk/Taxation/0/1/0 .

Arrangementet har vist sig ikke have den forventede effekt, meldtes det for nylig (i 2001). De kvalificerede begyndte at søge til England og USA allerede i begyndelsen af 1980-erne, som nævnt. Så må vi vente på østlandene kommer ind i EU.

Ikke erfaringer andre steder fra, hvor vil I hen!

Liberalen, 2006

Fri indvandring til Irland (Irland invaderes):

https://danmark.wordpress.com/2006/05/26/irland-og-fri-indvandring/

Ja, 2005 er den på plads:

https://danmark.wordpress.com/2006/07/04/polakker-kommer-i-lange-baner/

I foråret 2006 introduceres i tråd hermed et nyt arrangement, der tillader immigranter uden videre at overskride grænsen til Danmark for at søge jobs i 6 måneder, uden nogen formel ansøgning. Onkler, fætre, kusiner og svogre er her i forvejen. Fri indvandring.

Efter danskerne nu to gange ved folkeafstemning har stemt Nej til mere EU konkurrerer politikerne om at sikre, at alle EU-regler godkendes her på forhånd. For smækker fælden uanset.

A propos, Acquis Communitaire-doktrinen (jf. Bernard Connolly):

“The transformation of power had to begin with the relatively non-controversial functions of ‘economics’ and of ‘production of steel’ to minimize the worries about loosing or the break down of the national sovereignty. You had to secure the functional transformation of power became irreversible (without any possible reverse), a relation guaranteed the treaty-doctrine acquis communitaire to secure that all power transferred to (European) institutions of community was made permanent European law, and at the same time that they were taken out of the sets of laws in the member countries.”

EU-direktiver og anbefalinger i forlængelse af Schengen-aftalen

Første skridt

Det indre marked fra 1986 frihed for produkter tjenesteydelser, kapital og arbejdskraft til bevæge sig mellem medlemslandene fra 1. januar 1993. Alle EU-statsborgere.

Andet skridt

Schengen samarbejdet blev besluttet i 1985 og førte faktisk samarbejdet med Amsterdam-traktaten, der trådte i kraft 1. maj 1999. Enhver interne grænselinie-kontrol i EU fjernedes. Borgerne fra andre dele af verden fik i princippet den samme ret til frit at flytte rundt. Fælles minimums-regler og regulering af immigrationen skulle sikre at en enkelt medlemsstat ikke blot overførte dens byrder til en anden medlemsstat.

I bekneb for en fælles EU-immigrations-politik.

Tammerfors-deklaration 1999, punkt 18:

Den europæiske union skal sikre en mere retfærdig behandling af tredje-verdens-borgere, der har taget lovligt ophold i EU. En mere effektiv integrationspolitik som tillader rettigheder og pligter kan sammenlignes med EU-borgernes, og den fortsætter med en hellig hymne om racisme, forskelsbehandling, økonomisk, kulturel og sociale forhold.

Et direktiv fra sommeren 2001:

Om forholdene for tredje-verdens-borgeres adgang og ophold i forbindelse med tage arbejde og som arbejdsgivere, der driver uafhængige forretninger.

Tredje skridt: 25. november 2003 blev et EU-direktiv besluttet: om status for tredje-verdens-immigranter som indbyggere efter fem års ubrudt og lovligt ophold i EU skulle give frihed flytte rundt i EU også.

Marts 2004: EU-direktiv om forholdene for tredje-verdens-borgeres adgang og ophold I forbindelse med studier, anden uddannelse eller lærlingeforhold, også kaldt studenter-direktivet.

Næste skridt: 11. januar 2005 offentliggjorde EU-kommissionen en såkaldt grønbog om metoden ved hvilken den økonomiske immigration skulle styres (mellem medlemsstaterne med forskellig økonomisk politik) for at fremtvinge fælles regler. Dette punkt blev yderligere styrket to måneder senere ved offentliggørelsen af en anden grønbog med titlen: ”Demografiske ændringer – behovet for solidaritet mellem generationer”.

Oktober 2005: Ministerrådet beslutter et direktiv om særlig adgangs-procedure for tredje-verdens-borgere i forbindelse med videnskabelig forskning , i øvrigt sammen med to anbefalinger af samme kaliber.

7. november 2005 fra Kommissær for Justits og Indre anliggender, italieneren Franco Fratinni, et USA-inspireret Green-card-system som giver højtuddannede fra hele verden muligheden for at vinde adgang og tilladelse til at arbejde i alle medlemsstater.

Her skal vi ikke lære af erfaringen heller:

https://danmark.wordpress.com/2006/07/05/danmark-green-card-ordning-i-usa-burde-give-erfaringer/

Liberalen, 2006: Fri indvandring: https://danmark.wordpress.com/2006/05/26/irland-og-fri-indvandring/

Hvordan det videre skal køre?

Per et såkaldt “Vejkort” (road map) med initiativer, der skal foreslås i perioden 2006-2009: https://danmark.wordpress.com/2006/06/07/afviklingen-er-planlagt/

Vi må se i øjnene, at vi bliver udslettet, hvis vi bliver ved Fodbold WM og Touren.

I 1994 var der en fremsynet mand, der hævdede i sin sidste debat på TV(TV 2) – medens der var fodbold på den anden kanal:

“Danskerne kommer til at dø i deres lænestole.”

Sonia

HK-privat berettede om immigrant-antal til mange – det koksede!


   

“Hvad siger han nu?”, replik af Sigrid Horne-Rasmussen som lejlighedsministeren Lis Dusinius i den danske film fra 1965: En ven i bolignøden :

 

Stemmer ikke med facitlisten…der heller ikke stemmer

– men stemmer næsten med den korrigerede statusopgørelse fra IoD pr. 1. januar 2006 med et men mere

Der kom mange reaktioner til Information om Danmark på artikel i bladet HK-Privat side 12, april 2005. Og jeg er blevet bedt om at se på artiklens oplysninger. Én gang for alle kan jeg give følgende skudsmål, der også er tilgået HK-Privat betids: 

 

Ingen reaktioner fra HK-Privat

  

Information om Danmarks kommentarer:

Den morsomste: 170.919 indvandrere og efterkommere i arbejdsstyrken 2003. Når vi så dividerer med deres samlede antal 698.282, så får erhvervsfrekvensen 24,5%:

Vi læser noget ganske andet, der også umiddelbart ses at være fuldstændig forkert, længere nede i tekstboksen. Vi må desværre fastslå, at DS er nået til 337.802 ikke-vestlige pr. 1. januar 2005.

Ser vi derimod på antallet af indvandrere og efterkommere i alt, så når HK-Privat til 698.282 (= 337.802 + 360.480) og DS til 452.095 året efter 1. januar 2005.

Og det er ikke fordi et større kontingent er rejst hjem. Så langt fra.

Antallet af nye immigranter steg i 2005:

https://danmark.wordpress.com/2006/05/25/indvandringen-tiltog-i-2005/

Desværre kan jeg ikke se nogen behørige kildehenvisninger noget sted; hvilket er blevet fast rutine under løgnenes regime. Det hjælper ikke jeg anmoder om, at ville yde HK-Privat assistance; jeg er som bekendt at betragte som ukvalificeret. Ole har vist bedre forbindelser. Jeg nøjes med at henvise til vore omhyggeligt udførte analyser på det foreliggende, men mangelfulde officielle grundlag:

Vi har gennemgået tingene og måttet aflæse officielt  463.282 pr. 1. januar 2006, 452.095 pr. 1. januar 2005 og 442.036 i alt pr. 1. januar 2004, når vi så på tabellerne for indvandrere og efterkommere i Nyt fra Danmarks Statistik (DS). Antallet af indvandrere er af de grunde jeg har anført gang på gang næsten dobbelt så stort netop nu. Men lad os ikke inspireres af HK-Privat’s artikel, fordi mistænkeliggørelsen af vores kritik så måske kunne mindskes på et falsk grundlag.  

I sidste middelalder var der også udbredt mistænkeliggørelse byggende alene på tro, der i groveste tilfælde kan forhindre folk i at tænke, og det der måske er værre. Jeg har kommenteret det fejlbehæftede materiale fra HK-Privat side 12 , april 2005 over for hr. H. Vinter, der skrev hertil, ligesom jeg gennem årene siden 1987 har rettet oplysninger om befolkningsforhold fra Danmarks Statistik. Jeg har her kun set på få af fejlene i artiklen, der læses af ganske mange organiserede i Danmark:

Det mest paradoksale – faktisk lidt morsomme – er, at de 698.282 stemmer meget godt over ens med vor korrigerede statusopgørelse pr. 1. januar 2006, når der udelukkende tælles ikke-vestlige immigranter og deres børn og børnebørn: 

Korrigeret status pr. 1. januar 2006:

https://danmark.wordpress.com/2006/05/25/grafisk-illustration-af-det-korrigerede-befolkningsregnskab-pr-1-januar-2006/

Der viser mindst 700.000 i alt stammende fra områder uden for Vesteuropa, Nordamerika, Israel, Japan, Australien og New Zealand.

Denne korrektion af status fører til en tilsvarende korrektion af vor prognose fra 2003: 

https://danmark.wordpress.com/2006/06/20/prognose-pa-korrigeret-befolkningsgrundlag/

Det er “fint”, at HK-Privat muligvis sætter et fjols til at indsamle tal fra Statistikbanken, Befolkning og Valg på DS, så resultatet kommer til at ligne vort resultat. At vedkommende bortset fra folketallet og antallet 337.802 finder nogle antal (vistnok, og i hvert fald folketallet og de 337.802) opgjort pr. 1. januar 2004 (?), som vi ikke kan se noget sted hos Danmarks Statistik (DS). Ellers kan det bero på, at DS har nogle mindre tilgængelige sider, eventuelt organiseret via Intranet, der indeholder sådant materiale. Vi skal ikke glæde os over, at HK-Privat således på mindre troværdigt grundlag offentliggør nogle totalantal, der har mere med virkeligheden at gøre, end informationer andet steds fra i de officielle kilder. Nøgletallene nederst i artikel-boksen er også fejlagtige; det ses umiddelbart. Men det kan vi altså ikke bruge tid på.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Nogle reaktioner, der motiverede ovenstående udredning:

 

Hej, Ebbe !

Hermed en vedhæftet fil med fremmed- og arbejdsløshedstal fra medlemsbladet HK-privat. De maner skepsis og mistænkeliggørelse af dine fremmedantal i jorden, også fra min bekendtskabskreds. Håber du kan bruge dem til noget. Jeg har tilladt mig en lille sammentælling foroven.

Mvh, Bent

—————————————————————————————— 

Kære Ebbe

Kan du gennemskue, hvad det er for tal?

http://www.dst.dk/  opgives som kilde, men jeg kan ikke finde tallene på hjemmesiden.

Venligst

Harry

——————————————————————————————-

Kære Ebbe

Jeg hælder efterhånden til den antagelse, at et fjols har begået en – uforsætlig – brøler

Venligst

——————————————————————————————-

Kære Ebbe

Jeg opdager nu, at tallet 337.802 findes i Nyt nr. 197 fra 11. maj 2004.

Men det er jo også 360.480, der er det mest interessante.

vh

——————————————————————————————-

Disse oplysninger kan ikke hentes andre steder i Danmark. Arbejdet hermed foregår under forudsætninger, som ingen i de politisk korrekte kadrer forestiller sig.

Derfor ville et bidrag  til den fortsatte produktion og offentliggørelse være velkomment på konto i Danske Bank:  Reg.nr. 3629 kontonr. 3629461213

 

 5. juli 2006

Joern E. Vig, cand.oecon.