EU Economics in secret file (in English)

EU Economics in secret file

Somebody may remember that the European Parliament had a voting about a new order on limitation of the Freedom of Speech exactly when the banners’ and ambassies’ arsens wildly caused havoc in the Middle East and in South Asia. In reality the new proposal of the notorious EU-constitution included such general provisions too.  

Perhaps some may take the opinion that the danger is blowing over. Now there will not come more EU to be introduced on this account. EU is exactly constructed precisely in opposite. Always more, never less.   

The system was consciously built in the fifties on the foundation described by Bernard Connolly. In 1995 a senior civil servant Bernard Connolly took on leave from his job as manager in the section for Monetary issues of the European Commission to write his controversial book. It was a product of his freedom of work: ‘The Rotten Heart Of Europe’ was the title. 

He argues that the compulsory monetary value of unit is being used to generate an overwhelming moment as leverage for getting a political union of an progressive scale in place. The elite in Germany and France must divide the power. Mr. Connolly got his resignation at once. He has been proposed to try to defend himself in the European Court in Luxembourg. As far as we know he cleverly did not show up after having experienced both this and that.    

He writes among other things that the European politicians seldom have felt strongly the need to hide their wishes to create the United States Of Europe, especially in their mutual talks in periods between elections.  

“The transformation of power had to begin with the relatively non-controversial functions of ‘economics’ and of ‘production of steel’ to minimize the worries about loosing or the break down of the national sovereignty. You had to secure the functional transformation of power became irreversible (without any possible reverse), a relation guaranteed the treaty-doctrine acquis communitaire to secure that all power transferred to (European) institutions of community was made permanent European law, and at the same time that they were taken out of the sets of laws in the member countries.”  

EU has some so-called regulations of how the create a new law, with which the systems of law in the member states conflicts. The Commission have drawn back the worst. It could be matters of insults connected to subjects abroad, where the press suddenly would have to take all laws in the world into consideration. It is not the only thing. The proposal from the Commission that is on retreat now implied that Italian law had to count, if anybody in Italy felt offended by bad publicity in the for example the British media. The incident with the Muhammed-drawings threw a bright lightening on what was coming up in the EU-law-complex.

The proposal that had to be altered now also implied that Danish courts would have to judge according to Pakistani law, because the country of harm in the proposal did not just include the member states, but generally all countries of the world.Even the media proposal of law has provisionally been removed. The responsible Italian Commissioner Franco Frattini did actually report recently that a common EU-legislation about offences in media is need.   

Euro and Economics, for example in Spain:

Since 1997 (to 1996) the prices on houses have increased by 300 p.c. It has naturally implied the begin of a mega demand, and increased the building activity substantially in the country. In the first 11 months of 2005 the deficit on the balance of payments amounted 7.3 p.c. of GNP, and the deficit was expected (late 2005) to increase even further. The deficit could easily be forecasted to more than 8 p.c. in 2006, and even more than 9 p.c. in 2007. Spain has (officially) low unemployment and high artificial growth – founded on what? The inflation is higher than in the other Euro-countries, and the competition prevent Spain from reach balance. Everything is just fine…, in about 7 years not a single Spanish export industry is left, if the development is allowed to continue.  

The development looks a great deal like the development in USA  ”and another small country in the North”, but USA has the possibility to reduce the value of the US-dollar and spin itself into a web of security with investments of US-papers in areas of low wages. This is not possible to any comparable degree for Spain “and for the small country in the North”.    

Read about and compare this report with another newspaper report (for fun and to note the inconsistency)  Spain needs lots of immigrants, the growth is “almost” extreme:

https://danmark.wordpress.com/2006/05/20/european-population-and-workforce/ (English version)

https://danmark.wordpress.com/2006/06/09/europa-500000-600000-indvandrere-pr-aar-fremover/ (in Danish)  

A propos: 

EU’s hidden file Of Economics:  Of the member states. There is a good reason why the file has been hidden, when you read fragments of it. It is funny to look at some of figures of indication in the Danish period Notat no 1166 of 10 Marsh 2006, and then compare those figures with what we read in the mainstream press.   

It is maintained that the employment, defined as “the number 15-64 years old in jobs divided with the total number in this group”, should be the highest in Denmark 75,6 p.c.  – that implies officially that 24,3 p.c. must be unemployed, expelled, under education, on early retirement and so on – “they call their child almost everthing”. There is a long distance down to Holland with degree of employment of 73.1 – and let exposure that the referred Danish figure is a little overestimated or directly false reported probably from Denmark. Germany and France are to found far below on the file as respectively 11 and 13, and Spain, as you just read should be placed pretty high on the file/the score take the place no 18. On place no 25 you find Polan with a degree of  employment of  51.7 p.c., that implies that just the half of the population between 15 and 64 years old are unemployed in Polan with 48,3 mill. inhabitants. It looks like this fact that we have divide with them in the years to come. If we for a moment turn to the investments; we read that Denmark take place no 13 – if financial investments (lending in the widest meaning of the word) are included is not easy to say. And here you find Spain in place no 3 (financial investments ditto).   

We could guess on Tjekkia and Ireland with lowest taxation in Europe perhaps take the places 1 and 2.  We cannot use more room for a highly questionable EU-file that has been hidden for good reasons – perhaps to be used to instruct the professional politicians. It is difficult to imagine another use.  The impacts from Euro has been qualified describe before EU-referendum in Denmark in 1997 – qualified means the results matched our diagnosis/prognosis/forcast:  

https://danmark.wordpress.com/2006/06/02/when-the-pound-and-nordic-krones-shall-be-abolished/    

How the so-called hard Euro devastate the remains of the European real economics in an actually weak Europe:   

https://danmark.wordpress.com/2006/06/05/usa-arabien-eu-i-dilemma/ (in Danish)  

and  

https://danmark.wordpress.com/2006/05/25/euro-float-in-oil/ (in English)  

European workforce (corrected):

https://danmark.wordpress.com/2006/05/20/european-population-and-workforce/   

 Real Welfare And Real Globalization:

https://danmark.wordpress.com/2006/05/18/real-welfare-real-globalization/   

and 

New International Monetary System (Monetary Globalization):

https://danmark.wordpress.com/2006/05/19/new-monetary-system/    

2. juli 2006

Joern E. Vig, M. Sc. (Economics)