http://jyllands-posten.dk/uknews/article4527908.ece
http://www.oecdobserver.org/news/archivestory.php/aid/563/Can_governments_influence_population_growth_.html
I England føder de indvandrede tre gange flere børn end den angelsaksiske befolkning (2007):
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1571969/Britains-highest-birth-rates-among-migrants.html#
A baby boom among immigrant families is driving the population to a record high, government figures will show this week.The figures, from the Office for National Statistics, will reveal that Britain’s highest birth rates are in the Pakistani and Bangladeshi communities, both predominantly Muslim. The birth rate among women born in Pakistan but living in the UK is three times higher than that among British-born women, the figures will show. The evidence of a rising birth rate underlines last month’s official projections, first revealed in The Sunday Telegraph, which showed the population on course to rise to 77 million by the middle of the century, or even 91 million at the highest forecast.
The fertility rate – the average number of children a woman will bear in her lifetime – has risen to 1.87. Five years ago it reached a low of 1.63, well below the “replacement rate” needed to keep the population stable in the absence of immigration. Since then, a sharp increase in immigration has lifted the birth rate.
———————–
Vi må understrege at det netop refererede omhandler fødselsraterne, der er afhængige af alderfordelingen – ikke fertilitet.
I Canada falder/tilpasser immigranterne fertiliteten (2006): http://www.statcan.gc.ca/kits-trousses/issues-enjeux/c-g/c-g1-eng.htm
Sverige er dog et de morsommeste lande at læse om totalfertilteten i:
http://www.indexmundi.com/g/g.aspx?c=sw&v=31 : 2003:1,54, 2004:1,66 …. 2007:1,67 …. 2011 1,67
http://micpohling.wordpress.com/2008/08/06/total-fertility-rate-sweden-1970-2007/
1970 — 1.91
1971 — 1.96
1972 — 1.91
1973 — 1.86
1974 — 1.87
1975 — 1.77
1976 — 1.68
1977 — 1.64
1978 — 1.60
1979 — 1.66
1980 — 1.68
1981 — 1.63
1982 — 1.62
1983 — 1.61
1984 — 1.66
1985 — 1.74
1986 — 1.80
1987 — 1.84
1988 — 1.96
1989 — 2.01
1990 — 2.13
1991 — 2.11
1992 — 2.07
1993 — 1.98
1994 — 1.88
1995 — 1.73
1996 — 1.60
1997 — 1.53
1998 — 1.51
1999 — 1.50
2000 — 1.55
2001 — 1.57
2002 — 1.65
2003 — 1.72
2004 — 1.76
2005 — 1.77
2006 — 1.86
2007 — 1.88
Wikipedia melder om 1,93 i 2009
Verdensbanken på : http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.TFRT.IN anfører: 1,9 fra 2002 til 2006 og 2,0 fra 2007 til 2011
http://www.scb.se/Pages/GsaSearch____287280.aspx?QueryTerm=total+fertilitet&PageIndex=1&hl=sv: 1,9849 i Sverige i 2009 og 1,8751 i Danmark i 2009
Nu melder DS selv om 1,84 i 2009, 1,88 i 2010, 1,76 i 2011 og 1,7332 i 2012 efter Danmark var blevet observeret af OECD at have sat rekord i hele den industrialiserede verden.
——————————————-
Afhængig af hvor meget det kan lykkes at forblinde offentligheden og de internationale organer med skrønen at flere offentlige tilskud og mere offentligt betalt lediggang i forbindelse med fødsler sammen de professionelle opgørelsesmageres ædle metier i organerne samlet fører til en reduktion i antallet af fødsler blandt immigranterne pr. administrativ indsats, kan løgnen fortsættes.
http://danmark.wordpress.com/2007/02/05/antal-boern-og-fremmedandel-der-lyves-groft-herom/














[...] Holder vi os til den sandsynligste procentandel 20% fås med “…three times higher than that among British-born women…“: [...]
Pingback af England og fødselsraterne « Danmark — 30. august 2012 @ 10:26
[...] Skandalen fortsætter vildt: http://danmark.wordpress.com/2012/08/30/skandalos-omtalebehandling-af-fertiliteten-international-for… [...]
Pingback af OECD BURDE TAGE KONSEKVENSEN AF DEN DANSKE REKORD I “FERTILITET” | transeurabia — 18. april 2013 @ 18:32
[...] Skandalen fortsætter vildt: http://danmark.wordpress.com/2012/08/30/skandalos-omtalebehandling-af-fertiliteten-international-for… [...]
Pingback af OECD BURDE SE PÅ DE OFFICIELLE FERTILLITETER I DANMARK | Xanthippe — 23. april 2013 @ 18:58